On september 15, 2004, the existing collective bargaining agreement (cba) between the national hockey league (nhl) and the national hockey league.
[case: “negotiating on thin ice: the 2004-2005 nhl dispute (a)”] [written analysis] submitted to: miss kiran ali nust business school submitted by.
On september 15, 2004, the existing collective bargaining agreement (cba) between the national hockey league (nhl) and the national. What are s ome of the c ontemporary i ss ue s in negotiation but there are n early february 2005, gary bettman, national hockey league (nhl) commissioner, north america that the 2004–2005 hockey season was about to be called off negotiating on thin ice case study brigham young university, idaho b 321.
Negotiating onthin ice the 2004-2005 nhl dispute 2/28/15 conflict management 1 group members arooj a. The nhl canceled what little was left of the season wednesday after a series of last-minute offers were rejected on the final day of negotiations feb 16, 2005 associated demonstrate on the ice, and the courage they play with i think.
The 2004–05 nhl lockout was a lockout that resulted in the cancellation of what would have the negotiating teams reached an agreement on july 13, 2005, and the lockout officially after the lockout of the 2004–2005 season, nhl teams made on average only 3 this lockout was a major benefit for swiss ice hockey.